Discussion Hub is a general discussion community aiming to provide a fun and laidback environment with a touch of old school. We have a diverse memberbase with people from all over the world and tons of content for you to get involved in and share your perspective. We’d love for you to become a part of our awesome community.
I don't agree that it always teaches kids that violence is OK. Anyway, as I was saying, certain psychos abuse parental authority, and unfortunately, would be big supporters of corporal punishment.I'm definitely against it. It does nothing but teach kids that physical violence is the way to solve conflict.
My parents never raised a hand at me, and I'm pretty sure I'm a well adjusted middle age man.
So it's okay to beat your kids as long as the parents are not psychotic?I don't agree that it always teaches kids that violence is OK. Anyway, as I was saying, certain psychos abuse parental authority, and unfortunately, would be big supporters of corporal punishment.
So it's okay to beat your kids as long as the parents are not psychotic?
Why can't the parents talk to their kids? Why does it have to go right to getting spanked? And at what age? Why do you not spank a baby? But suddenly it's okay at whatever age? The formative years for a child is around 3 - 4. if I understand it correctly. After that, personality doesn't change a lot. So going around beating your kids for every little thing isn't going to do anything but cause trauma later in life.
Why does everyone say "Spare the rod, spoil the child"? Has there been a wide, carefully done case study? I am one of 5 kids, we were not spanked in any way, and we are all loving, kind, gentle people.
Well all kids are not the same. However, some are incredibly rotten for whatever reason (boys will be boys etc.) and they just have to be spanked. I mean, look at the family breakdown leading to America's huge prison population.I was spanked as a child when I was out of line and verbal reprimands did not work, and I turned out OK! I was not physically abused and I didn't have marks in my body when spanked but for sure, being spanked meant I F*ed up biiig time!!! Did it work? YES! I certainly thought about it twice next time I wanted to run my mouth and be disrespectful.
In that case, it was abuse. It wasn't normal.people punishing her. That goes back to my point.I of course respect everyone's opinion in this thread. There is clearly no right or wrong answer here. I am biased in my view, however, because my g/f was severely "disciplined" as a child, usually for very minor things, and now has extreme PTSD. There was absolutely no need for that.....
The sad part is that no one considered it abuse.In that case, it was abuse. It wasn't normal.people punishing her. That goes back to my point.
Research links physical punishment to risks of harm to children’s cognitive, behavioural, social and emotional development. A meta-analysis involving over 160,000 children found that physical punishment can carry the risk of physical abuse (causing a physical injury) and can have similar negative outcomes for children: mental health and emotional challenges, lower cognitive ability, lower self-esteem, more aggression, more antisocial behaviour and negative relationships with parents.Other studies and reviews have added that stress from physical punishment for children can negatively affect their brain development. In addition, physical discipline can quickly and unintentionally escalate to abuse.
Yeah, it's sad the culture pretty much can give a green light to it and, of course, the abusers will probably use an excuse like, "What? Do you want me to be soft?".The sad part is that no one considered it abuse.
Yeah, it's sad the culture pretty much can give a green light to it and, of course, the abusers will probably use an excuse like, "What? Do you want me to be soft?".